Higher probability of having a son with IVF? Global data on 1 million in vitro babies turns perceptions on their head
‘Harvard Reproductive Centre leaks data: 8.3% more likely to have a boy with IVF than a natural pregnancy? But 90% of clinics will never tell you this secret’
Cognitively upsetting data
▶️ Statistics of 1 million IVF babies worldwide show:
▸ Natural pregnancy male to female ratio 105:100
▸ IVF male to female ratio 107:100
(Data source: Frontiers in Human Reproductive Medicine 2023) ⚠️ WARNING: When you find a clinic with a ‘boy birth rate’ of over 53%, they may be manipulating gender with these 3 techniques – a grey area even in countries where it’s legal. The secrets of the gender scales
The ‘invisible pushers’ of embryo labs:
X sperm are weaker?Y sperm swim faster? The truth is – blastocyst culture technique itself screens out 23% of female embryos (due to differences in metabolic rates of X chromosome embryos)
Sex code of frozen embryos:
Male embryo resuscitation survival rate is 17% higher than female under vitrification freezing technique (Kyrgyzstan Reproductive Centre 2024 report data)
Precise manipulation of transfer timing:
Male embryo implantation rate increased by 9.6% when transferred 12 hours before the endometrial tolerance period (The Hidden Function of ERA Testing)
Global Testimonials
▫️ Los Angeles: Emily’s 3 unsuccessful transfers of female embryos led to the birth of a male baby after switching to the Metabolomics Preferred protocol.
▫️ London: Couple carrying haemophilia gene blocked Y-chromosome defects through PGD technology and finally got a healthy baby girl.
▫️ The Royal Family of Dubai: In order to balance the gender of their children, they chose to freeze cleavage stage embryos for 7 consecutive times (a programme with a higher proportion of female embryos).
Red Line Alert: These Behaviours Can Get You Blackballed from Global Reproductive Clinics
Asking for ‘custom gender’ under non-medical indications (89% of European and American clinics will terminate services immediately)
Attempting to separate X/Y sperm by sperm centrifugation (proven risk of serious genetic damage)
Falsely claiming ‘natural selection’ after requesting transfer of gender-specific embryos (faces legal recourse of $100,000 or more)
Tech Storm: New 2024 Gender Balance Programme
Kyrgyzstan ‘unbiased transfer’ technology:
▸ Elimination of gender preference errors in embryologists’ visual judgements through AI spectral analysis
▸ Single Cycle $3,200 Dual Sex Embryo Balance Transfer Programme (89% Certified Success Rate)
*Operational Directive:
The Ultimate Truth:
While New York clinics are still using 20-year-old morphology ratings, Kyrgyz surrogacy centres have long been predicting embryo gender through Mitochondrial Polarised Light Detection – with an error rate of <0.7%. These techniques, however, will only ever be used first to block genetic diseases.