Navigating IVF treatment can be emotionally and physically challenging, especially when faced with suboptimal ovarian response. Studies indicate that 15–30% of IVF cycles experience poor follicular development, often leading to difficult decisions about continuing treatment. This article examines the causes of inadequate ovulation outcomes, evidence-based solutions, and critical factors to consider when deciding whether to proceed with IVF.
A woman’s age is the strongest predictor of ovarian response.
Standard IVF protocols may not address individual hormonal profiles.
Chronic stress elevates cortisol, which suppresses GnRH secretion and disrupts follicle development.
Clinicians typically recommend cancellation when:
Age Group | Eggs Retrieved | Live Birth Rate per Cycle |
---|---|---|
<35 | ≥8 | 40–50% |
35–37 | 5–7 | 30–35% |
38–40 | 3–4 | 15–20% |
>40 | ≤2 | 5–8% |
Protocol | Mechanism | Ideal Candidates |
---|---|---|
DuoStim | Two stimulations per cycle | DOR, time-sensitive cases |
Natural Cycle | No stimulation, single egg retrieval | Low responders avoiding meds |
PPOS | Progesterone prevents ovulation | High LH sensitivity |
Possibly. Seek centers with:
Most experts recommend reevaluating after 3–4 unsuccessful cycles with euploid embryos.
Not always. Adjusting protocols and adding adjuvants can reset outcomes.
Continuing IVF with poor ovarian response requires careful risk-benefit analysis. While age and biology set limits, innovations in protocol customization, adjuvant therapies, and lab technologies continue to push success boundaries. Partnering with a specialist who tailors approaches to your unique profile maximizes chances while safeguarding health.
Kyrgyzstan Surrogacy Agency,Global IVF Hospitals,International Surrogate Mother Recruitment